Evolution, Diet and Genetics

Niles

Well-Known Member
Messages
670
Mass extinction is already on the horizon. Infertility has increased among men and women, predominantly western.

Due to various factors but mainly as you pointed to being technology. If we let go of our true nature too much, sperm counts will continue to drop along with women being less fertile.

Human degredation is greater in first world than third world nations according to the sources I've read.

Also isn't there new findings of human species originating from other areas other than Africa?
As far as I know, the latest fossil evidence still points to Africa being where homo sapiens evolved. There are other theories, but they don't have nearly as much evidence and aren't widely accepted.

I honestly think lower fertility rates isn't as much of a threat as other factors at this point (maybe in the future if it persists) - if anything it helps curb overpopulation, which is currently a bigger threat to our species' future.
 
Last edited:

diffi

Well-Known Member
Messages
129
Mass extinction is already on the horizon. Infertility has increased among men and women, predominantly western.

Due to various factors but mainly as you pointed to being technology. If we let go of our true nature too much, sperm counts will continue to drop along with women being less fertile.

Human degredation is greater in first world than third world nations according to the sources I've read.

Also isn't there new findings of human species originating from other areas other than Africa?
I researched asw.
Chemicals, drugs (painkillers, fin, duta, estrogen (pill)), BPA, plastic, education, noutriture (heavy metals, parasites, dht inhibitors at Mc...), certain clothes material!, feminism, chronic stress at work, metoo like debates, less vit.d/less sun are developed on purpose to destroy the first world. Also to mention all the wars since the 30years war - in war you generate trauma for a whole population and this is running on epigenetic modification and is given to the next generation. Ppl wonder why they have depression and forget that their grandparents might have faced the second WW. The wars were intended to depopulate Europe not to fight against invented enemies.
It is not about money only, it is about blood lines. All the elites come from the Pharaohs. Wherever you see an obelisk, lions, eagles, snakes (medicine!, pharma), pyramides: all Pharaoh stuff. Isis!!!, Amun Ra, etc. It is about the blood lines.
Not to forget the transgenda: many stars are transgender, but the mass is not aware of it (Spears, Leo, Gisele, Serena Steffi Graf!...): Sports, models (Victoria secrets...), actors, TV hosts, secretaries, and last but not least the roy.fam.
So, we have been deceived all our life.

The good news are: the Pharaohs in old Egypt build Pyramided for transferring free energy (Tesla). It was not invented for the Pharaohs themselves. And the messages are clear to see there: the predicted! an asteroid to crash the earth in several thousand years (27000 if I rem.well).
So, I guess, almost all life could be erased.
I guess, the DUMBS build by the elite won't really help.
In one sentence: Pharaohs didn't dissapear, they are the elite but have other names: almost all presidents are pharaohs. They are all connected.
Right and left labours are only : divide et impera. And technology is developed to surveil all ppl : everyone is surveilled.
We are slaves of them as at the ancient times.
So, every guy who things he is rich or somebody like your neighbour being a bank director is nothing.
What they fear, are strong men: especially those with mental power and the berserkers.
Thats why they developed fin and the pills: to put them down.
Only those with natural high testo and dht (less sensitive to androgens) will have massively upregulated AR due to lack of dht deprivation. Cause those need more of androgens: only way: massive upregulation. Here we are.
Good luck to us all.
 

Reverse

Well-Known Member
Messages
330
I researched asw.
Chemicals, drugs (painkillers, fin, duta, estrogen (pill)), BPA, plastic, education, noutriture (heavy metals, parasites, dht inhibitors at Mc...), certain clothes material!, feminism, chronic stress at work, metoo like debates, less vit.d/less sun are developed on purpose to destroy the first world. Also to mention all the wars since the 30years war - in war you generate trauma for a whole population and this is running on epigenetic modification and is given to the next generation. Ppl wonder why they have depression and forget that their grandparents might have faced the second WW. The wars were intended to depopulate Europe not to fight against invented enemies.
It is not about money only, it is about blood lines. All the elites come from the Pharaohs. Wherever you see an obelisk, lions, eagles, snakes (medicine!, pharma), pyramides: all Pharaoh stuff. Isis!!!, Amun Ra, etc. It is about the blood lines.
Not to forget the transgenda: many stars are transgender, but the mass is not aware of it (Spears, Leo, Gisele, Serena Steffi Graf!...): Sports, models (Victoria secrets...), actors, TV hosts, secretaries, and last but not least the roy.fam.
So, we have been deceived all our life.

The good news are: the Pharaohs in old Egypt build Pyramided for transferring free energy (Tesla). It was not invented for the Pharaohs themselves. And the messages are clear to see there: the predicted! an asteroid to crash the earth in several thousand years (27000 if I rem.well).
So, I guess, almost all life could be erased.
I guess, the DUMBS build by the elite won't really help.
In one sentence: Pharaohs didn't dissapear, they are the elite but have other names: almost all presidents are pharaohs. They are all connected.
Right and left labours are only : divide et impera. And technology is developed to surveil all ppl : everyone is surveilled.
We are slaves of them as at the ancient times.
So, every guy who things he is rich or somebody like your neighbour being a bank director is nothing.
What they fear, are strong men: especially those with mental power and the berserkers.
Thats why they developed fin and the pills: to put them down.
Only those with natural high testo and dht (less sensitive to androgens) will have massively upregulated AR due to lack of dht deprivation. Cause those need more of androgens: only way: massive upregulation. Here we are.
Good luck to us all.

I follow some of what you're saying and agree with maybe the first and last paragraphs. I do think it's very possible the elites are purposefully doing thing to secure their dominance over the species and planet.

Kinda like how some ancient civilizations had the elites manipulate the general population to engage in mass sacrifices of children and of eachother.

The only real threat to their dominance would be families that align and combine both brain and brawn to bring a better world for the "common" man.

Maybe some of us here that see this reality, will ally with eachother for the long term beyond this forum because as you pointed out our lineages are in direct line of attack.
 

Niles

Well-Known Member
Messages
670
Not to forget the transgenda: many stars are transgender, but the mass is not aware of it (Spears, Leo, Gisele, Serena Steffi Graf!...): Sports, models (Victoria secrets...), actors, TV hosts, secretaries, and last but not least the roy.fam.
So, we have been deceived all our life.
Finally someone's identified the real threat to humanity: Steffi Graf's secret dick.
 

diffi

Well-Known Member
Messages
129
H
Finally someone's identified the real threat to humanity: Steffi Graf's secret dick.
hahaha, I like your generalised joke. Very good.
Transgenders get their dicks cut off and get surgery treatment. They get all needed hormones before puberty.

You can research yourself.

But thx once again for the joke :).
 

Reverse

Well-Known Member
Messages
330
I'm a bit surprised no one started with the "it's the jews!" lol

but in all seriousness, we can make a human decision, a mans decision to uphold the responsibility that comes with the knowledge of things such as the common and very possibly purposeful side effects from pharma.

That is to not lose sight of this knowledge and continue a united endeavor to not only increase in this knowledge but also see to it that our lineages not forget and even possibly, be the ones to carry our genetics and medicine at large to higher status.

I know we have bright gentlemen here on HS and I myself am currently in academia.

Perhaps we can go beyond, like those currently holding the keys of the human genome, editing and cloning.

Or we can just pretend that it'll all go away and our DNA will never be at risk again. And let our futures be possible victims when all this is swept under the rug by the pseudo science community.
 
Last edited:

MNK99

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,560
Finally someone's identified the real threat to humanity: Steffi Graf's secret dick.
It's out there and it's coming for you bro. Watch out.
 

tanedout

Well-Known Member
Messages
538
Mass extinction is already on the horizon. Infertility has increased among men and women, predominantly western.

Due to various factors but mainly as you pointed to being technology. If we let go of our true nature too much, sperm counts will continue to drop along with women being less fertile.

Human degredation is greater in first world than third world nations according to the sources I've read.

Also isn't there new findings of human species originating from other areas other than Africa?

Something that seems to get little coverage is that working age (18-65) populations have peaked in almost all developed countries now, including China. So populations might grow for a while longer, but it's now due to an ageing population. So less and less workers will have to support more and more older people. And bar sub-saharan Africa, this is basically happening everywhere, so you can't just increase for population easily through immigration. High IQ working age populations are all in decline.

So global population is likely to take a sharp decline. We've had massive population growth in the last century, but it's really due a cross-over period when infant mortality rates reduced massively, but couples still had lots of babies. This led to a population boom, but these babies have grown up to have much fewer offspring.

I think infertility is being hugely under reported too. I know of many couples who want children, or more children, but it's just not happening for them. Estrogenic medications being dished out constantly, meds getting into water supplies, plastics - it's probably all a factor.
 

raven

Well-Known Member
Messages
493
Even in Bangladesh birth rates are under replacement now, it's crazy how quickly the shift has happened all over the world. When I think India I think of 6 children per family, but it's only 2 now. Even in Sub Saharan Africa it's gone from something like 8 to 4.

The world population is going to peak at maximum 12 billion and then start to decrease. The biggest worry is that for countries in the West we are going to have to provide for a huge elderly population if we want to maintain living standards. In Eastern Europe it is doubly bad because a lot of the educated young population are leaving, plus birth rates are super low. In countries like China they don't care about their elderly and don't have to worry about being democratically voted out so they wont do anything.
 
Last edited:

MNK99

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,560
-Brain Drain everywhere.
-Also mass emigration.
-Also... well my mom's mom like 12 siblings, maybe 8-9 survived. My mom had like 30-40cousins+. I have like 6-7... like a few first ones. -Mom has 2 siblings.
-One a super high ADD doctor. Hilarious guy, but drank too much. A good uncle. But like me was very funny... but more serious as time went on, still funny tho*.
-one of my best friends, Arab: has like 40cousins+ and he's my age. So his Dad and Mom? Who knows how many (I am guessing a crazy high number).
-Also a couple friends from Saudi Arabia -- super high number of relatives that they actually know too.
-Under replacement historically fine for US and CANADA and UK etc, bc of emmigration vs immigration so 1.7 child birth rate is fine. 1.3 1.1. 0.9 0.5 -6 etc not so fine...
-Daily emigration outside india was more than in or net equal when I randomly checked like 8mo ago (per day, not sure if it was super accurate tho).
 
Last edited:

raven

Well-Known Member
Messages
493
-Brain Drain everywhere.
-Also mass emigration.
-Also... well my mom's mom like 12 siblings, maybe 8-9 survived. My mom had like 30-40cousins+. I have like 6-7... like a few first ones.
-one of my best friends, Arab: has like 40cousins+ and he's my age. So his Dad and Mom? Who knows how many.
-Under replacement historically fine for US and CANADA and UK etc, bc of emmigration vs immigration so 1.7 is fine.
-Daily emigration outside india was more than in or net equal when I randomly checked like 8mo ago (per day, not sure if it was super accurate tho).

lol same here, I have 12 cousins, Mum has so many that it is basically a meaningless relationship, and it's kinda sad but my kids will likely have 1 or 2 maximum
 

MNK99

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,560
Yeah 0-2 for me. Every kid costs like 250k+ if not way more. "Bad kids" = way more too. I hear...
Also "bad kids" often only seem bad... bc they are misunderstood. anywys.
Education goes up (altho kind of went down for some examples in my family -- but not sure how the hell they got those educations back then 100yrs ago, only rich ones were... plus british system/ taking ships to London). --> anyways... more education in general and higher survival rates, more intensive nurturing as time goes on...
-also back then "work hard or 'it's over' " basically. -Also less distractions.
-and yeah less kids. Even with a ton of money... pretty hard to take care of 5-20 kids.
-I mean how the fk you supposed to remember all that?
 
Last edited:

tanedout

Well-Known Member
Messages
538
Even in Bangladesh birth rates are under replacement now, it's crazy how quickly the shift has happened all over the world. When I think India I think of 6 children per family, but it's only 2 now. The world population is going to peak at maximum 12 billion and then start to decrease. The biggest worry is that for countries in the West we are going to have to provide for a huge elderly population if we want to maintain living standards. In Eastern Europe it is doubly bad because a lot of the educated young population are leaving, plus birth rates are super low. In countries like China they don't care about their elderly and don't have to worry about being democratically voted out so they wont do anything.

It seems impossible that current high living standards will be maintainable in the West. All the social welfare models basically came into being in the 2 decades after WW2 when economic growth was extremely high, birth rates exploded, so pensions etc were all based on returns averaging 8% per year etc. Over the years the organic growth fell to levels which could not sustain this, so debt slowly replaced the organic growth. You had the gold standard being ditched in '71 to basically allow more money to be printed, more debt to taken on. It's been going on like that ever since, and you've got massive unfunded liabilities now in almost all Western countries, but the can is just kicked down the road as nobody will vote in a political party who will address it.

I see no other way out than for governments to just print. This will sooner or later create massive inflation, so it'll wipe out the debt, and wealth too. I'm surprised inflation hasn't already started to take hold. The BoJ and ECB have taken balance sheets to insane levels.
 

MNK99

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,560
--deficit financing till something else takes over... (not while we are young... maybe* who knows).
--US dollar still will exist despite the insanity I've heard in Crypto of course, lol.
-But yes, Debasement of currency will continue.
--destructive system of IMF, World Bank, Goldman, Fractional Reserve Banking... etc., continues.
--Human Capital Development Approach > all else, as a way forward*.
--Somewhat Socialist Economists (PhD)'s can explain what I'm trying to say, far better than I.
-***-I mean realistic non insane PhD's.***
 
Last edited:

raven

Well-Known Member
Messages
493
It seems impossible that current high living standards will be maintainable in the West. All the social welfare models basically came into being in the 2 decades after WW2 when economic growth was extremely high, birth rates exploded, so pensions etc were all based on returns averaging 8% per year etc. Over the years the organic growth fell to levels which could not sustain this, so debt slowly replaced the organic growth. You had the gold standard being ditched in '71 to basically allow more money to be printed, more debt to taken on. It's been going on like that ever since, and you've got massive unfunded liabilities now in almost all Western countries, but the can is just kicked down the road as nobody will vote in a political party who will address it.

I see no other way out than for governments to just print. This will sooner or later create massive inflation, so it'll wipe out the debt, and wealth too. I'm surprised inflation hasn't already started to take hold. The BoJ and ECB have taken balance sheets to insane levels.

Growth may have slowed but we are still 10 fold richer in real terms than folks in the 60s. We should be able to afford everything we could afford then and more. Another problem is that high bracket income tax rates have fallen dramatically, and inequality has dramatically increased, it was this tax revenue that contributed to our pensions and public services.

Since the rise of finance in the 70s, rise of offshore tax havens, ease of international money transfer, it's been impossible to keep rates as they were because there is no international cooperation in tackling these problems despite them being international issues. With Western wide cooperation these problems could be easily tackled, but the hands of any individual country (except perhaps the US) are tied.
 

tanedout

Well-Known Member
Messages
538
Growth may have slowed but we are still 10 fold richer in real terms than folks in the 60s. We should be able to afford everything we could afford then and more. Another problem is that high bracket income tax rates have fallen dramatically, and inequality has dramatically increased, it was this tax revenue that contributed to our pensions and public services.

Since the rise of finance in the 70s, rise of offshore tax havens, ease of international money transfer, it's been impossible to keep rates as they were because there is no international cooperation in tackling these problems despite them being international issues. With Western wide cooperation these problems could be easily tackled, but the hands of any individual country (except perhaps the US) are tied.

With declining populations though it will completely redefine what wealth is. With less and less people you could have 10 Rolex watches, but who would want them? Who wants a collection of classic cars when the next person who just died left a collection too? Populations would likely concentrate in cities, so rural homes may slowly be abandoned. Everything is essentially based on growing demand, and the bottom falls out as soon as the demand starts to decline. It's hard to guess what would be the best stores of wealth in that situation.
 

raven

Well-Known Member
Messages
493
With declining populations though it will completely redefine what wealth is. With less and less people you could have 10 Rolex watches, but who would want them? Who wants a collection of classic cars when the next person who just died left a collection too? Populations would likely concentrate in cities, so rural homes may slowly be abandoned. Everything is essentially based on growing demand, and the bottom falls out as soon as the demand starts to decline. It's hard to guess what would be the best stores of wealth in that situation.

Yep. even with increasing populations we are seeing rural towns and villages slowly being abandoned in the UK due to rapid urbanisation. Young people coming the cities in droves and old ways of life going extinct, it's sad.

A lot of Western countries are using migration to prop up demand, which works in the short term, but it isn't sustainable long term to perpetually increase population, especially when the places you take immigrants from are eventually going to start shrinking as well. Political parties only think about the next election cycle. The technology and capital is there to ensure our quality of life doesn't fall over time. But as soon as demand starts to fall the private sector will collapse, which is why I think we need a slow return to more nationalised industry that can invest money in the public interest while we are still growing, and take the losses when we start to shrink.

The stores of wealth may be the natural resources that really count; water, arable land etc.
 

Aleksandr

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,285
Finally someone's identified the real threat to humanity: Steffi Graf's secret dick.
Everyone knows only men can have a one handed backhand
 

Reverse

Well-Known Member
Messages
330
And everything, whether intentional or not, seems to further consolidate power and resources into the hands of a few people.
 

Reverse

Well-Known Member
Messages
330
Sometimes I tell people to freeze their sperm and eggs, if they seem to really want to learn and are "woke" lol

I'm doing it asap before recovery and after recovery.

I'll have two batches used for research and future baby making.