Search results

I agree, but remember those studies about how fin reduced DHT the same at 1mg as .1mg or something like that? That is what I mean - Like yeah of course taper down but theoretically speaking, you'd have to do some serious cutting to taper down from .1mg etc. Here is an article that talks about...

I have everything done but DHT

Bind to dht receptors right?

Yeah but pot is also a 5ar inhibitor or has similar actions. It's crazy this was years back but when I quit smoking pot, boom hairloss. Before that it was premium. Prime. I also noticed that when I quit my libido was shot. Took years to return. This is why I am running DHT soon after these...

Dude pot def. Fucked me up sexually too

This is what @Helen and I were kinda discussing yesterday. Well more so me. I ts highly likely people need to condition the body to accept R andro, or DHT before starting it full blown.

It'll be alright bro. DHT ain't that suppressive

You can't taper down finasteride, if i remember correctly

Risk it to get the biscuit

Whats LDN

Yeah man, I def. notice some changes in sleep. I am cycling it, on the outbound currently with reduced dosage. Def. do not want to immediately withdrawal

Update: Oral DHEA seems to have brought some pleasant gains. I never had my DHT levels tested, but I am shifting my sights to increasing DHT as of now. Ordered DHT powder. Will update when I get the damn stuff. Also, I am beginning to DOUBT Russian Star Peptides performance of DHT. From what...

Not an argument, rather a corroboration as I am looking at the results posted with this study

Bro I've been through all the results on PH multiple times, I do not see high T ratings as you mention at all. But again, I don't know the scale this study uses for its plasma concentrations

But I do not see that reflected at all. I mean, high T for The U.S. would be like around 800. I certainly don't see that

Perhaps that is where I am going wrong here, what is the scale of the T ratings in this study? Is it what you specified? 8-30? In that case, I wouldn't say T is high at all in PFS guys

@talkingant I am on the discord now if you want to discuss

Well that is the issue - if the study is displaying values of a T rating of ~12, and we are not seeing that reflecting in the online community, what can then be the external validity of the findings separate from the T ratings? Edit @talkingant and this is keeping in mind the sample size of 16...

Yeah but look at the difference between control and actual, it's almost fucking half bro

We're gonna build the wall