Aleksandr
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,285
So after @gbolduev made this post
"
being bald is a mutation, at one point in your life you got to the point of missing some nutrient that the body had to mutate the organ, not the skin, but some organ. So now basically you live in the mutated state and it is a compensatory state. meaning shaky. this is what aging is , a mutation. to me it is unbalanced and not a healthy state . person will always need to compensate for it.
the only antimutate therapy I know is fasting and extreme fasting not some 10 days worthless stuff. LIke 100 days, or 50 days, after that you are reborn.
fasting is anti mutation thing. that is what RPF does not get. If you tell me your hair wont grow back after series of 50-100 days fasts. I would say NO WAY. It will. And you will look like you are in high school . Peat says that fasting breaks down heart, spleen kidney. Great, that is what I want. I want to fast to the point when fasting starts breaking down organs. Only then it works. All this 5- 10 day fasts to me are worthless and waste of time. Plus you need to be in the ocean while fasting, since body take what it needs to rebuild."
It got me thinking about my own leanness and reluctance to fast. What are you saying gbold, tht what matters most is that protein and organs are being eaten in order to cause them to rebuild minus the mutations???
If so, then i understand a 40 day waterfast for someone who is 30kg overweight. The first month is probably just burning off pure fat, anyway? @mattyb
If im starting at an already lean 12.5% bodyfat, surely i dont have to fast as long? Like im sure it would only take maybe 7 days and my fat is already gone and im already burning protein and organs at this point.
So the 30kg overweight person:
30 days burning fat, then 10 days of protein / organ burning is 40 days of fasting.
For me at 12.5% bodyfat:
10 days (if that) burning fat, then 30 days of protein / organ burning? Is this how it works??
So basically not all fasts are created equal, i would get 3x the duration burning protein and organs, if i did the full 40 days?
Thus for the same kind of health benefit as a 30kg overweight person, i could just fast for 17 days, Since we both still get 10 days protein/ organ burning?
Ive totally guesstimated most of this stuff, but you get the theory / point im trying to make here hopefully. What do you think gbold, matty?
"
being bald is a mutation, at one point in your life you got to the point of missing some nutrient that the body had to mutate the organ, not the skin, but some organ. So now basically you live in the mutated state and it is a compensatory state. meaning shaky. this is what aging is , a mutation. to me it is unbalanced and not a healthy state . person will always need to compensate for it.
the only antimutate therapy I know is fasting and extreme fasting not some 10 days worthless stuff. LIke 100 days, or 50 days, after that you are reborn.
fasting is anti mutation thing. that is what RPF does not get. If you tell me your hair wont grow back after series of 50-100 days fasts. I would say NO WAY. It will. And you will look like you are in high school . Peat says that fasting breaks down heart, spleen kidney. Great, that is what I want. I want to fast to the point when fasting starts breaking down organs. Only then it works. All this 5- 10 day fasts to me are worthless and waste of time. Plus you need to be in the ocean while fasting, since body take what it needs to rebuild."
It got me thinking about my own leanness and reluctance to fast. What are you saying gbold, tht what matters most is that protein and organs are being eaten in order to cause them to rebuild minus the mutations???
If so, then i understand a 40 day waterfast for someone who is 30kg overweight. The first month is probably just burning off pure fat, anyway? @mattyb
If im starting at an already lean 12.5% bodyfat, surely i dont have to fast as long? Like im sure it would only take maybe 7 days and my fat is already gone and im already burning protein and organs at this point.
So the 30kg overweight person:
30 days burning fat, then 10 days of protein / organ burning is 40 days of fasting.
For me at 12.5% bodyfat:
10 days (if that) burning fat, then 30 days of protein / organ burning? Is this how it works??
So basically not all fasts are created equal, i would get 3x the duration burning protein and organs, if i did the full 40 days?
Thus for the same kind of health benefit as a 30kg overweight person, i could just fast for 17 days, Since we both still get 10 days protein/ organ burning?
Ive totally guesstimated most of this stuff, but you get the theory / point im trying to make here hopefully. What do you think gbold, matty?